top of page

A Look Back at a Tenth Circuit Veterans Case

  • Mar 6, 2025
  • 2 min read
tower law group case study

This month we celebrate Veterans. So let's discuss a well-established case from the Tenth Circuit decided in 2018, which has significant implications for disability claims involving Veterans Affairs (VA) ratings: Green v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration.


Green, an Army veteran, was denied Social Security disability benefits despite being rated 100% unemployable by the VA because of his PTSD and other service-related conditions. Despite this, the ALJ concluded Green could perform medium work and dismissed the VA’s findings, focusing instead on Social Security's stricter criteria.


The central issue on appeal was the ALJ's failure to properly consider the VA’s unemployability rating. The court emphasized that while VA decisions are not binding on Social Security claims, they should still be properly analyzed. 


The ALJ, however, discounted the VA’s assessment by merely stating that the two agencies have different standards without addressing the substantial psychological evidence that the VA relied upon.


The Tenth Circuit reversed the ALJ's decision, citing the failure to adequately consider the VA's disability rating and the related mental health evidence. 


The case was remanded, reinforcing the idea that ALJs must provide more than a cursory dismissal of the VA's findings, especially when the claimant’s mental health issues, such as PTSD, are significantly involved. Here are some key takeaways from this case:


Cross-Agency Decisions


While VA and Social Security disability criteria differ, ALJs must engage with the underlying evidence, not just dismiss the rating.


Mental Health Evidence


This case highlights the importance of thoroughly addressing psychiatric evaluations, especially when PTSD or other mental health issues are central to the claim.


Proper Consideration 


Ensure that when cross-referencing other agency findings (like the VA), the ALJ discusses specific evidence supporting or contradicting the findings, instead of broadly dismissing them.


Got any questions? Schedule a consultation with us. I’m here to help. It’s a lot to take in, but we’ll get through it together. After all, navigating these waters is always easier when you’ve got someone to chat with.

alt="Tower Law Group homepage"
Phone Icon - TLG Yellow

STAY UP TO DATE

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date with Tower Law Group®.

Facebook Logo - Gold
IG Logo - Gold
TLG X Logo
TLG Linked In Footer Logo

 

Copyright © 2026 Tower Law Group® All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy Disclaimer Law Firm Accessibility Statement  |  Terms of Use​​​​​​​​​​​

 

​​

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: 

We appreciate your interest in Tower Law Group®. This website is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. Visitors should not act or rely on any information on this site without first consulting a qualified attorney.

Your use of this website or submission of information does not create an attorney-client relationship with Tower Law Group® or any of its attorneys. Please do not send confidential or sensitive information through this website or via email.

An attorney-client relationship is only formed after Tower Law Group® confirms that it does not have a conflict of interest and agrees to represent you.

Any information submitted prior to such confirmation will not be treated as confidential and will not prevent Tower Law Group® from representing other clients with adverse interests.

 

This website was last updated on June 4, 2026 to reflect current legal information, statutes, and guidance.

bottom of page