top of page

A Look Back at a Tenth Circuit Veterans Case

  • Mar 6, 2025
  • 2 min read
tower law group case study

This month we celebrate Veterans. So let's discuss a well-established case from the Tenth Circuit decided in 2018, which has significant implications for disability claims involving Veterans Affairs (VA) ratings: Green v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration.


Green, an Army veteran, was denied Social Security disability benefits despite being rated 100% unemployable by the VA because of his PTSD and other service-related conditions. Despite this, the ALJ concluded Green could perform medium work and dismissed the VA’s findings, focusing instead on Social Security's stricter criteria.


The central issue on appeal was the ALJ's failure to properly consider the VA’s unemployability rating. The court emphasized that while VA decisions are not binding on Social Security claims, they should still be properly analyzed. 


The ALJ, however, discounted the VA’s assessment by merely stating that the two agencies have different standards without addressing the substantial psychological evidence that the VA relied upon.


The Tenth Circuit reversed the ALJ's decision, citing the failure to adequately consider the VA's disability rating and the related mental health evidence. 


The case was remanded, reinforcing the idea that ALJs must provide more than a cursory dismissal of the VA's findings, especially when the claimant’s mental health issues, such as PTSD, are significantly involved. Here are some key takeaways from this case:


Cross-Agency Decisions


While VA and Social Security disability criteria differ, ALJs must engage with the underlying evidence, not just dismiss the rating.


Mental Health Evidence


This case highlights the importance of thoroughly addressing psychiatric evaluations, especially when PTSD or other mental health issues are central to the claim.


Proper Consideration 


Ensure that when cross-referencing other agency findings (like the VA), the ALJ discusses specific evidence supporting or contradicting the findings, instead of broadly dismissing them.


Got any questions? Schedule a consultation with us. I’m here to help. It’s a lot to take in, but we’ll get through it together. After all, navigating these waters is always easier when you’ve got someone to chat with.

Comments


alt="Tower Law Group homepage"
Phone Icon - TLG Yellow

FLORIDA

800 Executive Drive,

Oviedo, FL 32765

6900 Tavistock Lakes Blvd Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32827

IG Logo - Gold
Facebook Logo - Gold
TLG X Logo
TLG Linked In Footer Logo

INDIANA

201 N. Illinois St.

16th Floor - South Tower

Indianapolis, IN 46204

STAY UP TO DATE

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date with Tower Law Group.

 

Copyright © 2026 Tower Law Group All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy Disclaimer Law Firm Accessibility Statement  |  Terms of Use​​​​​​​​​​​

​​

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: 

The information on this website is provided by Tower Law Group for general informational purposes only regarding Florida probate law, estate administration, social security disability, wills, trusts, and related legal matters. It is not intended as legal advice and should not be relied upon as a substitute for consultation with a licensed Florida probate attorney.

Viewing or using this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship is only formed through a signed agreement with Tower Law Group.

Florida probate laws vary based on the facts of each case and are governed by applicable Florida Statutes and court procedures. You should consult a qualified probate attorney for advice specific to your situation, whether you are an executor, personal representative, heir, or beneficiary.

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every estate administration and probate matter is unique and depends on individual circumstances.

 

This website was last updated on April 21, 2026 to reflect current legal information, statutes, and guidance.

bottom of page