top of page

Let's Analyze If This Case Should Go to District Court

  • Mar 13, 2025
  • 2 min read
social security disability case

We talk a lot about cases after they go to the district court, but let’s talk about how we pick a case to go to the district court. We can’t take every case… it is a high bar. There has to be an error, that isn’t harmless, and then that error has to be unjustified to defend. Pretty hard, right? So I have to look at cases with a critical eye. Let’s look at this case that came across my desk and I wanted to share my analysis.


Sometimes I am amazed when cases get to me. Basics are basics and everyone at the Agency should be able to apply them. Well, apparently not…


Let’s talk about past relevant work (PRW) and substantial gainful activity (SGA).


For a job to qualify as PRW, it must meet certain criteria: recency, duration, and SGA. The work has to reach SGA levels. This is straightforward.


But someone at the Agency missed the memo.


In this case, the ALJ denied benefits at Step Four, claiming that the claimant could perform his past job as a Realtor. But the ALJ’s Decision showed that the claimant’s work as a Realtor didn’t reach SGA levels. The ALJ specifically found that it did not reach SGA levels for any year he did the work.


So, to sum up, the ALJ acknowledged that the Realtor work wasn’t SGA-level at Step One. Yet, by Step Four, we’re suddenly back to treating it as past relevant work so the ALJ can DENY the case.


I’m sorry, what?


Because here’s the elephant in the room: if you get to Step Five, the claimant would have qualified as disabled based on the ALJ’s assessment under the light Grids.


This Decision is frustrating and unnecessary. It’s a case where a simple, clear review should’ve led to a fully favorable outcome before reaching me. But instead, we’re here, going through rounds of appeals, all for an error that’s basic and well within the guidelines. 


Got any questions? Schedule a consultation with us. I’m here to help. It’s a lot to take in, but we’ll get through it together. After all, navigating these waters is always easier when you’ve got someone to chat with.

Comments


alt="Tower Law Group homepage"
Phone Icon - TLG Yellow

FLORIDA

800 Executive Drive,

Oviedo, FL 32765

6900 Tavistock Lakes Blvd Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32827

IG Logo - Gold
Facebook Logo - Gold
TLG X Logo
TLG Linked In Footer Logo

INDIANA

201 N. Illinois St.

16th Floor - South Tower

Indianapolis, IN 46204

STAY UP TO DATE

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date with Tower Law Group.

 

Copyright © 2026 Tower Law Group All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy Disclaimer Law Firm Accessibility Statement  |  Terms of Use​​​​​​​​​​​

​​

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: 

The information on this website is provided by Tower Law Group for general informational purposes only regarding Florida probate law, estate administration, social security disability, wills, trusts, and related legal matters. It is not intended as legal advice and should not be relied upon as a substitute for consultation with a licensed Florida probate attorney.

Viewing or using this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship is only formed through a signed agreement with Tower Law Group.

Florida probate laws vary based on the facts of each case and are governed by applicable Florida Statutes and court procedures. You should consult a qualified probate attorney for advice specific to your situation, whether you are an executor, personal representative, heir, or beneficiary.

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every estate administration and probate matter is unique and depends on individual circumstances.

 

This website was last updated on April 21, 2026 to reflect current legal information, statutes, and guidance.

bottom of page