top of page

Ninth Circuit: ALJs Can Reverse Course on Remand

  • Jun 13, 2025
  • 2 min read
reading a case social security disability case

An affirmance from the Ninth Circuit arose out of a Social Security remand on May 19, 2025. Years earlier, Johnson’s mental health condition was deemed “severe.” But on remand, the same ALJ reversed that finding—now labeling it “nonsevere”—despite no new treatments or evidence.


Why the flip? A non-examining psychologist classified her 2013 diagnosis as “temporary,” expecting it to resolve within six months. Even a decade later, with no updated records, the court treated this as “new, highly probative” evidence.


How the RFC Came Out Clean


Johnson argued the ALJ should’ve imposed mental limitations in the RFC:

  • Psychologist evidence: Dr. Brooks asserted any limitations expired after six months.

  • Claimant testimony/older opinions: Both were discounted—but Johnson didn’t effectively challenge these points on appeal.


The Ninth Circuit held she forfeited those issues by failing to meaningfully object. The result? The ALJ was allowed to “freeze” her favorable finding and deny benefits without considering new limits.


Practitioner Takeaways

  • ✅ Remands don’t lock in favorable findings.A supplemental remand hearing = a fresh factual record, not just a re-do.

  • 🕵️‍♂️ “New” evidence just needs to be new to the record, not new in time.Even decade-old opinions can be “new” if the ALJ first relies on them during the remand.

  • 📷 Preserve ALL arguments—and preserve them well.Weak or underdeveloped challenges? Consider them gone.


Q&A Section


Q: Does a remand bind the ALJ to prior favorable findings?

A: No. The ALJ can revisit and overturn prior findings—even without new medical records—so long as the change is supported by “new” evidence in the record.


Q: Can old medical opinions count as “new” evidence?

A: Yes. As long as they weren’t previously in the record, they still count.


Q: What happens if you fail to develop an argument on appeal?

A: You risk forfeiture. The Ninth Circuit treats undeveloped, unsupported challenges as abandoned.


For more information:



alt="Tower Law Group homepage"
Phone Icon - TLG Yellow

STAY UP TO DATE

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date with Tower Law Group®.

Facebook Logo - Gold
IG Logo - Gold
TLG X Logo
TLG Linked In Footer Logo

 

Copyright © 2026 Tower Law Group® All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy Disclaimer Law Firm Accessibility Statement  |  Terms of Use​​​​​​​​​​​

 

​​

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: 

We appreciate your interest in Tower Law Group®. This website is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. Visitors should not act or rely on any information on this site without first consulting a qualified attorney.

Your use of this website or submission of information does not create an attorney-client relationship with Tower Law Group® or any of its attorneys. Please do not send confidential or sensitive information through this website or via email.

An attorney-client relationship is only formed after Tower Law Group® confirms that it does not have a conflict of interest and agrees to represent you.

Any information submitted prior to such confirmation will not be treated as confidential and will not prevent Tower Law Group® from representing other clients with adverse interests.

 

This website was last updated on June 4, 2026 to reflect current legal information, statutes, and guidance.

bottom of page